Central Government Employees Protest Career Stagnation
Central government officials have escalated their concerns over prolonged career stagnation, demanding immediate interventions to address delayed promotions and unresolved cadre restructuring issues. A memorandum submitted to the Cabinet Secretary on July 24, 2025, highlighted systemic bottlenecks in the administrative machinery, with officials from the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) appealing to the Prime Minister’s Office for swift action. The CSS, which serves as the backbone of all central ministries, has faced chronic delays in cadre reviews and promotions, prompting a collective outcry from its workforce. The forum representing these officials emphasized the need for time-bound solutions to restore service parity and ensure fair career progression, which has been severely impacted by bureaucratic inertia.
Cadre Review Delays and Vacancy Crisis
The CSS, responsible for administrative operations across ministries, has not undergone a cadre review since 2018, despite a mandated five-year cycle. The fourth review, originally slated for 2018, remains unimplemented, with a seven-year delay now in effect. This stagnation has created a critical vacancy crisis, with nearly 2,500 positions remaining unfilled. The forum’s appeal to Cabinet Secretary T.V. Somanathan underscored the urgency of resolving these issues, as prolonged vacancies have disrupted operational efficiency and morale. The delay in finalizing the cadre review has also hampered the implementation of the Organised Group A Services (OGAS) benefits, further exacerbating the challenges faced by CSS officers.
Officers Face Promotion Delays Beyond Service Tenure
Under Secretaries eligible for promotion are experiencing acute stagnation, with many waiting over 12 years in their current grade despite the prescribed five-year residency requirement. Similarly, officers from the 2014 batch of Assistant Section Officers in the CSS are still awaiting their first promotion after a decade of service. These delays have created a significant gap between the prescribed timelines and actual implementation, leading to widespread frustration among the workforce. The forum’s letter to the Cabinet Secretary highlighted the human cost of these delays, with officers facing professional and personal challenges due to prolonged career limbo. Such issues not only affect individual careers but also undermine the overall effectiveness of the central administrative system.
Call for Immediate Reforms and Policy Interventions
The CSS forum has urged the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) to expedite the finalization and implementation of the fourth cadre review, emphasizing the need for institutional reforms to address systemic inefficiencies. The demand for time-bound promotions and service parity with other central civil services reflects a broader critique of bureaucratic sluggishness. Officials argue that without urgent interventions, the CSS will continue to face a talent drain and operational inefficiencies. The Prime Minister’s Office is under pressure to prioritize these issues, as delays in cadre restructuring and promotions threaten to erode public trust in the administrative machinery. The forum’s appeal underscores the necessity of policy reforms to ensure equitable career progression and administrative efficiency.
Broader Implications for Public Administration
The crisis in the CSS highlights deeper challenges in public administration, where delayed promotions and cadre reviews have created a backlog of unresolved issues. The forum’s demand for immediate action reflects a growing discontent among central government employees, who feel their careers are being sidelined by bureaucratic inertia. Experts warn that without systemic reforms, the CSS’s ability to function efficiently will be compromised, affecting the delivery of public services. The situation also raises questions about the accountability of administrative bodies in addressing long-standing grievances. As the CSS continues to grapple with these challenges, the need for transparent and timely interventions has never been more pressing, with implications for both individual careers and national governance.
About the Author
